Saturday, May 23, 2009

Where have all the bees gone?


I think is an important article-Please read.


To bee or not to bee - Where have all the bees gone?

© Kat Morgenstern, June 2007
Traditional beekeeping

There has been much buzz on the internet and in the media in recent months regarding a potentially catastrophic phenomenon - the mysterious disappearance of honey bees. In the US beekeepers from 24 States have reported unusually high losses of their colonies. But the phenomenon is not restricted to the US alone. Bees have also disappeared in parts of Europe and the Middle East, although losses are less drastic. Scientists and Beekeepers are confounded by the odd phenomenon, which despite concerted efforts to grasp at possible clues, remains unexplained.

Bees play a vital role in our ecology and economy. Ancient cultures have revered and worshipped honey bees for all the wonderful things they provide: honey, bee pollen, propolis, jelly royal, and beeswax are the most obvious. They also revered them as a source supplier for one of the earliest known inebriants - fermented honey drinks were among the first alcoholic beverages known to man. They still survive as honey wine and mead. And finally, even the ancients were well aware of their importance in bringing abundance to their crops.

Honeybees are vitally important pollinators. Although they are not the only creatures that perform this job, they are among the most efficient - and, importantly for agriculture, they are the easiest to manage. Over thousands of years man has developed a symbiotic relationship with bees, although the trade off has been heavily in mankind's favour. These days beekeeping is not a very romantic pursuit - it resembles the meat industry in the way these precious little creatures are manipulated, drugged and exploited.

Busy bee pollinating RhododendronCommercially kept bees are specially bred to increase beyond their natural size in order to make them more efficient pollinators, fed and sprayed with antibiotics to protect them against certain parasites and fungi and on top of it all, they have to battle with polluted food supplies that are not only contaminated with common environmental toxins, but also with poisons that are specifically designed to kill insects. Now they also have to deal with GM plants, global warming, which affects food availability cycles, and the stress of being moved around the country, thousands of miles at a time, to help pollinate different crops in different regions. In fact, 'rent-a-hive' operations present a greater source of income for beekeepers than any revenue they might expect from honey production.

Despite the fact that honey bees are not native to the US, a third of our agricultural production depends on pollination by honeybees - this is largely due to the fact that many of our crops are also not native to the land. Native crops continue to be pollinated by native species of bees and other pollinators, which seem to be unaffected by the recent syndrome that honeybees are suffering from.

The phenomenon, which has been dubbed 'Colony Collapse Syndrome' bears some very strange features: the bees don't seem to be dying in or near the hives - they just disappear. Very likely they are dying somewhere outside of the hives, but where and why nobody has been able to say. Also, very uncharacteristically, other swarms or predators seem to be reluctant to attack and rob the dead hive of its remaining food supply, which appears to be an indication that the nectar may be polluted.

In some instances where dead bees have been found, there seem to be a several pathogens present, each of which could be blamed for their demise - but what they really appear to indicate is that the bees' immune system has somehow been compromised - whether due to stress, malnutrition or exposure to toxic chemicals remains to be discovered. So far it has not been possible to identify one single common factor among all the affected hives. Curiously though, feral bees as well as organically kept bees that are not fed any antibiotic solutions and are not exposed to crops that have been sprayed with insecticidal and other chemicals have not been afflicted by this strange syndrome. Another important factor appears to be related to the size of the bees. As mentioned above, commercial bees are forced to grow bigger than they would under natural conditions. This is achieved by supplying them with foundation that has a larger diameter, which subsequently takes longer to cap over. This also means that the brood takes a little longer to develop and it seems that in that extra time opportunistic mites and viruses can really harm the
bees.

Traditional beehivesMy first instinct was that this has to do with GM crops, but as I started reading about the complexities of it all it became apparent that it is not as simple as that. Bees have disappeared in areas where GM crops are not being planted, and furthermore similar, though less severe occurrences of this phenomenon have been observed long before GM crops have ever been planted. Then as now the cause remained a mystery.

One factor, which has not yet been studied extensively, but poses a lot of questions and concerns, is the use of a new class of insecticides called 'neonicotinoids', which are known to be toxic to bees. Neonicotinoid insecticides include imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin. This class of insecticide is commonly used to coat GM seeds, and at times they are also sprayed directly on the soil, which facilitate their uptake directly into plant tissues, thus polluting both pollen and nectar. They are classed as 'systemic insecticides', which are active even in very low concentrations. Sub-lethal levels of imidacloprid confuse the honeybees' homing and foraging instincts. Depending on the dosage bees may either be temporarily impaired for a few hours or totally lose their way. This poison jumbles their sense of direction, their sense of smell and thus their olfactory learning ability. It also slows their general activity and ability to fly. These symptoms seem to fit remarkably well into the picture of affected honey bee colonies. Yet, significantly, there have not been any detailed studies of pollen or honey that are left behind in collapsed bee colonies - seems to me that this would be the obvious place to look for clues!

It baffles me that after all these thousands of years of our symbiotic relationship with honeybees, we still don't really know anything about them, and we don't seem to care much, either - even though our food security depends on them to a rather significant degree. Considering that organically kept bees are not affected adversely, the way ahead is clear. We need honeybees more than they need us. If we want their services we need to radically rethink (or better still, abandon) our destructive agrochemical ways. Organic is the buzz!
Beekeeping Resources

* http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/index.htm
* http://www.bushfarms.com/bees.htm
* http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/Organicbeekeepers/
* http://www.umext.maine.edu/onlinepubs/htmpubs/7153.htm
* http://www.beesfordevelopment.org/info/info/enviro/index.shtml

For questions or comments email: kmorgenstern@sacredearth.com

Friday, May 22, 2009

Newsweek
Sponsored By
The Path of a Pandemic

How one virus spread from pigs and birds to humans around the globe. And why microbes like the H1N1 flu have become a growing threat.

Laurie Garrett
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated May 18, 2009

Around Thanksgiving 2005 a teenage boy helped his brother-in-law butcher 31 pigs at a local Wisconsin slaughterhouse, and a week later the 17-year-old pinned down another pig while it was gutted. In the lead-up to the holidays the boy's family bought a chicken and kept the animal in their home, out of the harsh Sheboygan autumn. On Dec. 7, the teenager came down with the flu, suffering an illness that lasted three days. He visited a local clinic, then fully recovered, and nobody else in his family took ill.

This incident would hardly seem worth mentioning except that the influenza virus that infected the Wisconsin lad was unlike any previously seen. It appeared to be a mosaic of a wild-bird form of flu, a human type and a strain found in pigs.

It was an H1N1 swine influenza. Largely ignored at the time, the Wisconsin virus was a step along the evolutionary tree, leading to a virus that four years later would stun the world.

Flash-forward to April 2009, and young Édgar Enrique Hernández in faraway La Gloria, Mexico, suffers a bout of flu, found to be caused by a similar mosaic of swine/bird/human flu, also H1N1. And thousands of miles away in Cairo, the Egyptian government decides pigs are the source of disease, and orders 300,000 animals in the predominantly Muslim (therefore not pork-consuming) society slaughtered.

Each of these three incidents is related to the unfolding influenza crisis. It is the manner of human beings to seek blame during times of fear. Fingers are now pointing, either at the entire pig species Sus domestica, or at the nation of Mexico. Such exercises in blame are not only scientifically ill founded, ut are likely to prompt government actions that, at the very least, are useless and, at worst, harmful for efforts to control a pandemic.

We live in a globalized world, filled with shared microbial threats that arise in one place, are amplified somewhere else through human activities that aid and abet the germs, and then traverse vast geographic terrains in days, even hours—again, thanks to human activities and movements. If there is blame to be meted out, it should be directed at the species Homo sapiens and the manifest ways in which we are reshaping the world ecology, offering germs like the influenza virus extraordinary new opportunities to evolve, mutate and spread.

Back in 2005, the Wisconsin Division of Public Health hunted for sick pigs in Sheboygan County, but the animals the teenager had helped slaughter came from multiple farms across the area, and every farmer claimed his herd was healthy. The Wisconsin authorities forwarded blood samples from the infected teenager and his family to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. The CDC scientists discovered that the H1N1 virus had pieces of its RNA genetic material that matched a human flu first seen in New Caledonia in 1999, two swine types that had been circulating in Asia and Wisconsin for several years and an unknown avian-flu virus.

In 2006 the American Association of Swine Veterinarians reported that humans were passing their H1N1 viruses to pigs, causing widespread illness in swine herds, especially in the American Midwest. A year later at a county fair in Ohio an outbreak occurred, sickening many of the pigs, but not their human handlers. The cause was a type of H1N1 that was a close match to the Wisconsin strain, and may have been spread from human to pig.

Last year researchers from Iowa State University in Ames warned that pigs located in industrial-scale farms were being subjected to influenza infections from farm poultry, wild birds and their human handlers. Writing in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke said, "As a result of the constantly changing genetic makeup of individual influenza viruses in pigs, the U.S. swine industry is continually scrambling to respond to the influenza viruses circulating within individual production systems."

Something was changing. Pigs notoriously eat just about anything thrown their way, and rub up against each other frequently, readily passing infections within herds. Their stomachs are remarkably tolerant environs for microbes, which since ancient times have caused illness in humans who dined on raw or undercooked pork. Investigation of the 1918 influenza pandemic, which is now estimated to have killed up to 100 million people worldwide in 18 months, revealed that the viral culprit was a type H1N1 human flu that had infected pigs, and then circulated back to humans.

At the viral level, influenza is an awfully sloppy microbe that is in a constant state of mutation and evolution. Its genetic material is in the form of RNA (not DNA, as in humans), loosely collected into chromosomes. When a virus infects a cell, its chromosomes essentially fall apart into a mess, which is copied to make more viruses that then enter the bloodstream to spread throughout the body. Along the way in this copying process any other genetic material that may be lying about the cell is also stuffed into the thousands of viral copies that are made. If the virus happens to be reproducing this way inside a human cell, it picks up Homo sapiensgenetic material; from a chicken cell it absorbs avian genes; and from a pig cell it garners swine RNA. The jackpot events in influenza evolution occur when two different types of flu viruses happen to get into an animal cell at the same time, swapping entire chromosomes to create "reassorted" viruses.

What was infecting that teenager in Sheboygan was a triple reassortment, resulting in a new virus with bits of genes from three species of animals—one of them Homo sapiens.

But who pays attention to such things? Other than vets, pig farmers and the occasional virologist, not many people in public health, government or medicine usually give much thought to the four-legged viral mixing vessels that oink their way around family farms and vast industrial pork-production centers. Thacker and Janke's 2008 writing seems sadly prescient today: "Pigs would be an ideal mixing vessel for the creation of new avian/mammalian influenza viruses capable of causing novel diseases with the potential for producing pandemics in the human population … It is apparent that, in the U.S. swine industry, transmission of influenza viruses between swine and humans is fairly common and is bidirectional."Nine months ago the Texas Department of State Health Services reported the case to the CDC of an individual who was exposed to ailing pigs. The Texan came down with flu, spread it to no one and was fine after a few days. In the patient's blood, CDC scientists found "a swine influenza A (H1N1) triple reassortant virus, A/Wisconsin/87/2005 H1N1," the same virus that infected the Sheboygan teenager three years earlier.

And then, this March, the outbreak of 2009 commenced. It might not have been noticed, frankly, if things unfolded in the same bird/human/swine manner as had previously evoked only humdrum attention in Wisconsin, Ohio and Texas. But this time, people died.

In mid-March the number of routinely reported influenza cases in several Mexican states suddenly spiked upward. At roughly the same time, public-health authorities in southern California spotted two separate cases of flu in children: a 10-year-old boy in San Diego County, and a 9-year-old girl in Imperial County. Though both children survived their illnesses, there was evidence that it had spread to family members, and samples of the children's blood were examined at the CDC in early April. Bingo: H1N1 triple-reassorted influenza. Meanwhile, in Mexico, more than 50 serious flu cases emerged over the same time period, and the government forwarded blood samples to Canada's top infectious-diseases lab in Winnipeg. The Canadians confirmed that the Mexican mystery virus was H1N1, and the potential pandemic saga unfolded.

In Mexico, attention has focused on little Édgar Enrique Hernández, who is believed to have come down with the new flu on April 2. The blame for Hernández's infection is aimed at an American-owned industrial pig center located near the child's home in La Gloria. Residents had long complained about the stench and dust from the plant, and have eagerly named it as the source of the child's infection. It may be true that Hernández inhaled H1N1 from a pig, but because other cases emerged in March, the timing of the case is off: Édgar Hernández is not Patient Zero in the outbreak of 2009.

This virus has been evolving for a long time, no doubt aided in its transformation by the ecology of industrial-scale pig farming in North America. Some scientists say there are genetic elements in the virus that date back to an Indiana pig farm in 1987. In that sense, it is similar to the "bird flu," or H5N1, which surfaced in wild migratory water birds in southern China some time in the early 1990s and infected people in Hong Kong in 1997. As that virus has evolved over the past 12 years, it has taken advantage of large poultry farms, and major bird-migration centers, to spread rapidly and absorb new genetic material along the way. In 2005, as H5N1 spread to Siberia and Europe, the United Nations and the Bush administration mobilized cash, scientific expertise and the needed infrastructure to find and contain outbreaks, primarily by slaughtering infected chicken flocks.

In Indonesia, where the virus has spread to pigs and humans, it appears H5N1 can be passed, in rare cases, between people, and human infection is an extraordinarily dangerous event: 82 percent of infected Indonesians have succumbed to the flu virus. The global average mortality rate for H5N1 in people is 63 percent, which makes it one of the most fearsome microbes on earth.

Here, then, is where we stand.

We have a new virus in the world that appears to be very contagious between people, and possibly between swine and humans. It is, fortunately, treatable with the antiviral drugs Tamiflu and Relenza (oseltamivir and zanamivir), but it is resistant to the other major class of anti-flu drugs, amantadines. It is still evolving, and moving, and its ultimate trajectory cannot be seen right now. We do not yet know how deadly this virus is: while Mexico has been able to track down the numbers of dead and hospitalized H1N1 cases, it cannot determine just how many Mexicans have been infected with the virus since it started spreading there in late March. It's one thing to say that 150 people out of, perhaps, 10 million infected have died: that gives you a case fatality rate that is roughly what we see with normal, seasonal flu. (Each year, seasonal flu kills 36,000 people in the United States alone.) It's quite another story if Mexico's denominator is 5,000, for a case fatality rate of 3 percent--a full percentage point worse than the rate seen with the 1918 influenza. It is urgent that we discern the denominator.

We have a second, closely related H1N1 human virus in circulation around the world. Though widespread, it is not unusually lethal. Last year this virus developed full resistance to Tamiflu. It would be most disturbing if the 2008 H1N1 human virus were to reassort with the new swine/human virus, as we could then be facing a more drug-resistant pandemic strain of influenza, treatable only with the drug Relenza, which must be administered with an inhaler device.

We have a third, older pandemic in poultry, occasionally infecting humans, that involves the H5N1 virus. This pandemic has circulated long enough so that the virus has branched into several evolutionary trees, including forms that are drug-resistant. In Egypt, where it is common for urban families to raise chickens in their yards, H5N1 has caused a significant number of human cases, and its spread appears to be uncontrolled. The World Health Organization (WHO) is distressed by evidence that H5N1 is becoming less deadly for people. That could mean that the bird-flu virus is evolving toward a less-lethal form that is more capable of spreading between people.

It is supremely ironic, then, that the Egyptian government in late April started slaughtering the nation's 300,000 pigs as an alleged flu-control measure. The swine form of H1N1 may not be in Egypt as of this writing, but the chicken H5N1 most definitely is, and has to date infected 68 Egyptians, killing 23. Egypt has never carried out wholesale slaughter of poultry, as chicken is a staple of the national diet. Pork, in contrast, is consumed only by the minority Christian population. An Egyptian Islamist group has declared that swine flu is "God's revenge against infidels."

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt recently declared that the Cairo-based U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit (NAMRU), which has provided public-health work for the entire Middle East for decades, must be shut down, and Egypt must stop sending samples of H5N1 viruses that emerge in the country to the WHO. The Egyptian group, which holds seats in Parliament, is echoing sentiments first put forward by Indonesia's minister of health, Siti Supari, who has refused to share her country's H5N1 samples with the WHO since 2006. Supari is also trying to evict another NAMRU lab from Jakarta. On April 28, Supari declared that the new swine flu was genetically engineered and released in order to promote American pharmaceutical sales worldwide.

Two days later, Supari denied making such statements, though they were con-sistent with her longstanding claim that rich countries--particularly the United States--prey on poorer nations in the interest of drug-company profits. In heated negotiations with the World Health Organization and the U.S. government, Supari has insisted on the existence of "viral sovereignty," wherein nations own any viruses that they discover within their boundaries, have the right to refuse sharing them with the WHO or any other foreign entity and may demand all profits derived from vaccines and other products made from those viruses. Under this principle, Indonesia refuses to allow the outside world access to at least 50 H5N1 strains thought to have emerged in that country since 2005. Without access to the various viral strains, scientists cannot tell if H5N1 is evolving dangerous attributes in Indonesia, or whether the hideously high death rate in infected people there is due to some unique viral characteristics. Therefore, the principle of viral sovereignty directly imperils the entire global community--as well as Supari's own people. On April 30, the WHO repudiated another Supari claim: that Indonesians have special genetic or environmental traits that would keep them safe from the new swine flu.

Happily, Mexico has shown the world how a responsible nation can respond to a potential pandemic. By moving swiftly to shut down schools, entertainment and places of social congregation, Mexico—an already beleaguered economy—is facing dire financial consequences. But its dramatic actions may be saving Mexican lives, and slowing down the outbreak of 2009. In that sense, the world owes Mexico a big gracias.

Governments the world over would do well to pay attention to Mexico's response, and learn from it. Throughout Asia, governments have been pulling their old SARS-epidemic thermal monitors out of mothballs, and scanning people for evidence of fevers. That worked for SARS control because the SARS virus was almost exclusively contagious when people were running fevers. Not so with influenza: flu can be very contagious before the individual carrier has any symptoms at all, much less a fever.

Worse, some governments are banning pork products from the Americas, as if it were possible to get the flu from eating a cooked sausage. It is not.

A wiser set of pig-related actions would turn to the strange ecology we have created to feed meat to our massive human population. It is a strange world wherein billions of animals are concentrated into tiny spaces, breeding stock is flown to production sites all over the world and poorly paid migrant workers are exposed to infected animals. And it's going to get much worse, as the world's once poor populations of India and China enter the middle class. Back in 1980 the per capita meat consumption in China was about 44 pounds a year: it now tops 110 pounds. In 1983 the world consumed 152 million tons of meat a year. By 1997 consumption was up to 233 million tons. And the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that by 2020 world consumption could top 386 million tons of pork, chicken, beef and farmed fish.

This is the ecology that, in the cases of pigs and chickens, is breeding influenza. It is an ecology that promotes viral evolution. And if we don't do something about it, this ecology will one day spawn a severe pandemic that will dwarf that of 1918.

Garrett is the senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, and a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer. She is the author of "The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance" and "Betrayal of Trust: The Collapse of Global Public Health."

URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/195692

The Vineager of the Four Thieves

The story of the four theives comes from Europe and beleived to be in france and it goes like this…

Herbal lore has it that, while the Plague was raging in France, a rash of burglaries of plague victims’ homes was discovered. No effort was made, however, to apprehend the thieves, as it was assumed that they would soon succumb to the contagion in the homes they had robbed..

The thieves carried on their crime spree for some time, and people began to wonder why they had not become ill and die. It was then that the authorities began to pursue them… to discover the secret of their immunity to the Plague.

Once the burglars had been apprehended, they struck a bargain with the authorities, that they should be set free in exchange for revealing the secret to their immunity to the Plague.

It was then that the four thieves revealed the herbal disinfectant formula that rendered them immune to the Plague. They were believed to have worked at a perfumery and those who worked there did not succumb to the plague but developed an immunity to it.

Current theorists suggest that this formula, now called “Four Thieves Vinegar”, may offer protection against fearsome possible threats, such as the flu, smallpox, and biological weapons, which concern us today, as all of its ingredients are either strong anti-bacterial agents, or have potent anti-viral properties.

Hear are some recipes for the vinegar of the four thieves:

Four Thieves Vinegar

2 QT Apple Cider Vinegar
2 Tbls Lavender
2 Tbls Rosemary
2 Tbls Sage
2 Tbls Wormwood
2 Tbls Rue
2 Tbls Mint

The herbs can be fresh, powdered or whole. Please understand and make sure that you know this is absolutely not for drinking straight in large quantities. You can bath or spray it on your body or on contaminated surfaces. 1/2 tsp 5-7 times a day orally is quite adequate during the flu season for 7-10 days.

Put the herbs in the vinegar. Shake well. Let is sit in the sun for two weeks.

Open. Drop in six cloves of garlic. Cap it. Shake well. Let sit in sun for one week.

Strain. Pour into bottles or jar. Seal with wax or add glycerin to preserve it.

FOUR THIEVES VINEGAR II

1 part lavender, dried
1 part sage, dried
1 part thyme, dried
1 part lemon balm (melissa), dried
1 part hyssop, dried
1 part peppermint, dried
1 handful garlic cloves
Raw (unpasteurized), organic apple cider vinegar

• In a glass jar, place all dry ingredients.
• Add raw (unpasteurized), organic apple cider vinegar to cover
• Place jar in a cool place and let sit, at room temperature, for six weeks.
• Strain off herbs and garlic, and decant to a glass bottle or jar with a tight fitting lid.

HOW TO USE FOUR THIEVES VINEGAR
• Take a teaspoonful several times daily.
• Add to salads either directly or in a salad dressing.
• For personal protection, add a teaspoonful to bath water.
• Use as a topical spray for disinfecting surfaces and/or skin

ALTERNATIVE FOUR THIEVES VINEGAR
wormwood
meadowsweet
juniper berries
rosemary
camphor
sage
cinnamon
cloves
white wine vinegar

FOUR THIEVES OIL
1 part eucalyptus
1 part rosemary
1 part cinnamon
1 part clove
1 part lemon
Carrier oil (olive, jojoba, or your choice)
Mix

I put 50 drops of each oil in a 2 oz. bottle and then top it off with jojoba oil (I like jojoba oil because it seems to never go rancid).

An alternative recipe:

200 drops Clove Bud Oil
175 drops Lemon Oil
100 drops Cinnamon Oil
75 drops Eucalyptus Oil
50 drops Rosemary

Mix with jojoba oil.

APPLICATIONS:

• Apply 1-2 drops of Four Thieves on the bottoms of the feet and on the nape of the neck.
• Apply under the arms and on the chest.
• Diffuse for 20 minutes or less at work or at home.

Friday, May 15, 2009


Creating a NEW Sustainable
Lifestyle Option!

This is the overview of Shiloh's Garden Plan

Shiloh's Garden Plan is creating a complete library of guides for every step of building an infinitely sustainable settlement including but not limited to the steps for

bulletorganizing and planning a settlement - free
bullet land purchase - exchanged for agreements
bullet legislative change - state and local - free
bullet website template and public communication - free
bullet construction materials lists - free
bullet sustainable off grid systems - free
bullet organic farming -free
bullet greenhouse and nursery construction & materials lists - free
bullet self supporting income strategies for individuals and the settlement entity. - free
bullet establishing a renewing fund to support new settlements - exchanged for agreements
bullet budget and accounting - free
bullet publishing information - free
bullet co-op startup and management - free
bullet CSA and retail sales of produce and value added products - free
bullet re-foresting & creating living fences (regional guides) - free
bullet planting/harvesting/storing produce - partially free
bullet vineyard/orchard management - partially free
bullet permaculture plans - partially free
bullet conflict resolution - free
bullet resident education - free
bullet pre-resident education - free
bullet public education - free
bullet sustainable lifestyle fairs -free

The above referenced guides will be produced from extensive data collected from researches, and the creation of infinitely sustainable demonstration settlements and city domains.

In addition to producing extensive guides and support for newly forming settlements, Shiloh's Garden Plan will create and test a self renewing fund and self regenerating system of assistance and funding of additional settlements that will result in each test settlement financing a new settlement as often as every three to five years. Each of those new settlements will do the same, and so on.

The above plan is estimated to cost approximately 13.5 million plus the estimated costs for each of the following steps. The above plan will be accomplished in the following manner.

Shiloh's Garden Plan will create the first renewing fund and the first settlement, called The Little Muddy Eco-Farm.

Extensive Data will be collected throughout the process
Data will be compiled and published as guides.
Estimated Cost of approximately
22.7 million

The Little Muddy Eco-Farm will fund the second settlement with a three fold purpose.

To test and expand the effectiveness of the guides for creating a settlement relatively quickly and easily.

To create an operating renewing fund within the settlement that will be used to financially support a new settlement every three to five years.

To collect extensive data in creating the expanding network process and to use that data to create written guides to assist other settlements in creating a self-renewing fund that is capable of establishing a new settlement every three to five years.

Estimated cost of approximately 15 million

The third settlement will also have a three fold purpose

bulletTo test and refine the guides created in the previous two steps
bulletTo establish a broad base of demonstration settlements in North America.
bulletTo collect additional data for the continued refinement of guides provided to any and all future settlement groups.
bulletEstimated cost of approximately 15 million

Shiloh's Garden Plan will also be creating an Eco Community Demonstration with three goals

bulletCreate a self-sustaining model for city conversions to infinitely sustainable off grid lifestyles.
bulletcollect data for City Domain Conversion Guides including neighborhood restoration models.
bulletCreate a growing network of city domains in Denver that will be easily duplicated in cities throughout North America.
bulletEstimated cost of approximately 1.2 million for first city domain and 800,000 each for two test city domains.

Shiloh's Garden Plan will create most of the following educational products during the first two years of the first settlement.

  1. A full home school curriculum for settlement families that meets all current state and federal educational requirements.
  2. For all grade levels, a public school curriculum teaching infinitely sustainable lifestyles and transitions.
  3. Adult education modules for teaching various transitional and living skills such as
bulletfamiliarity with wild plants and animals of the area
bulletHarmonious Relationships with nature, self and others.
bulletConstruction methods
bulletPond and wetlands management.
bulletFamily transitions
bulletFinancially Self-sustaining enterprise

Wednesday, May 6, 2009


How to Easily Create
Your Own Compost

Creating a compost is one of the cheapest ways to get nutrient rich soil for your lawn and garden. It can take a little time and effort, but it doesn't cost a cent and is 100% better for the environment than any commercial fertilizers.

Compost Pile
Compost naturally fertilizes soil and stimulates root development in plants. A side benefit is that it eliminates some of the garbage that you throw out everyday. Why contribute to the overflowing landfill problem when you can use the same material to improve your lawn and garden!

"What goes into the pile?"

The microorganisms that decompose everything need a mixture of brown stuff and green stuff to munch on. A rule of thumb is to have a 30:1 brown to green ratio. Too much brown stuff will cause the material to break down too slowly, while too much green will cause the compost to smell. A proper balance of air and water is also needed for the microorganisms to live and work (just like us!).

Brown Leaves
Brown Stuff
Brown stuff is carbon rich material. It's also the dry material that is added. It's very easy to store because it's dead material and since it's the stuff you need the most of, that's a good thing! Some examples of the brown stuff are:

* Dried leaves
* Pine needles
* Newspaper
* Sawdust

Green Stuff
Green stuff is material rich in nitrogen. This is the wet material that is needed. This stuff is harder to store because it can go rotten in a short period of time and stink.
Grass Clippings
Fortunately, you need a smaller amount of this stuff! Some examples of nitrogen rich material are:

* Organic fruit and vegetable scraps
* Grass clippings
* Coffee grounds
* Horse manure


Air
Air circulation is a very important ingredient in your pile. Most of the organisms that do the decomposing are aerobic - they need air to survive. To keep your pile breathing, limit the amount of materials that are easily compacted like sawdust or ashes. If your pile is large or is lacking air, tree branches can be placed vertically in spots to add some circulation. For smaller composts, simply stirring your pile is effective.

Water
Water is important, but it's also important not to add too much! A rule of thumb is that the compost should be as moist as a rung out sponge.
Watering Can Sprinkling water on with a watering can is better than pouring it because the water gets more evenly distributed. If you end up adding too much water, just balance it out by adding more of the dry, brown stuff.

Soil
Soil is where the microorganisms come from. The amount of soil depends on the size of your pile. Typically a thin layer per brown and green layer is needed.

Let's put it all together!

Directions:

1. Select a spot to set up your bin or pile.
2. Spread a layer of brown stuff on the bottom. This should be about 6 inches thick. Sprinkle with water.
3. Spread a layer of green stuff on top. This should be about 2 inches thick. Sprinkle with water.
4. Sprinkle a thin layer of soil on top. Sprinkle with water.
5. Repeat until the bin is full.

The temperature of your pile is very important and it's simple to test. Just use your hand and feel it. If it's warm or hot everything is OK and working. If not, you'll have to help it along because the microbial activity has slowed down. Start by adding more green stuff like food scraps (preferably cut up), grass clippings, or manure. Add a little water and mix it up.

Is it ready yet?

If you can no longer recognize the material, then the compost is most likely done.

The finished material should have a dark, crumbly, earthy odor.

Compost Example
Do not use the soil before it's ready. The plants growing in the soil will not do well because the decomposing process is still happening. The incomplete compost will steal the nitrogen that your plants need.

If you think it's ready, but you see a couple of large chunks in it, just sift it or pull the larger things out by hand.

Different Types of Composts

Trenches
These are perfect if you have a garden. All you do is place leaves in the trenches between the raised beds, or through the pathways of your garden. By the end of the gardening season they will be decomposed and ready to use as a mulch.

Pockets
This is probably one of the easiest ways to dispose of kitchen scraps and create a nutrient rich pocket of soil. All you do is bury your fruit scraps, vegetable scraps, and coffee grounds into an 18 inch hole. Cover with a few inches of soil and about a month later you'll have the perfect spot to plant a flower or a plant!

Monday, May 4, 2009

Where do you buy your food?


H.R. Bill 875 Are You Concerned?

United States Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) has proposed legislation, H.R. 875, which would literally prohibit Americans from raising food for themselves, their families, or even for their animals, without the uber alles national government's permission! Extreme statement? NOT! H.R. 875 makes Americans serfs on their own land! Read on; this one bill could wipe the United States, as a free nation, from the face of the Earth! We urgently need your help to kill this extremely dangerous bill!

H.R. 875, the so-called Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (FSMA) sounds innocent enough at first blush, with language purporting to "protect the public health by preventing food-borne illness, ensuring the safety of food, improving research on contaminants leading to food-borne illness, and improving security of food from intentional contamination, and for other purposes." In reality, the FSMA is an extensive and all-controlling abomination that must be stopped!

The FSMA mandates registration of every "food production facility," which the bill defines as "any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation;" and every "food establishment," which the bill defines as "a slaughterhouse..., factory, warehouse, or facility owned or operated by a person located in any State that processes food or a facility that holds, stores, or transports food or food ingredients."

H.R. 875 makes NAIS look tame. This bill will not just sweep up commercial food operations. The fine print of the FSMA will subject hobby gardeners, home canners, anyone with a few chickens, or anyone who "holds, stores, or transports food" - including mushrooms or wild berries gathered in the wild - to registration, extensive management, and inspection by a huge new bureaucracy, the Food Safety Administration (FSA)- even if the food items will only be consumed personally. And registration must be via "an electronic portal," which will be costly and difficult for those without computers.

H.R. 875 exponentially advances the "Foodborne Disease Surveillance Systems" required of member states of the World Health Organization (WHO), which includes the United States. "Food establishments" will be required to adopt preventive process controls, including implementing recordkeeping and labeling of all food and food ingredients to facilitate their identification and traceability, including instructions for handling and preparation for consumption. This might sound rather reasonable... until you remember the definition of a "food establishment" above.

Immensely telling of how seriously this bill does not take "food safety," though, is Section 204(2)(C), which promises the Administrator will identify the "5 most significant (food) contaminants", and "not later than 3 years after a contaminant is so identified, the Administrator shall promulgate a performance standard..." Gee whiz, what's the rush?

Perhaps the Administrator's promulgation timetable has little to do with acting quickly and decisively to protect U.S. citizens (or even "all people in the United States" as required by the FSMA) and much, much more to do with the World Health Organization's stated desire in its 2004 report entitled "FOODBORNE DISEASE MONITORING AND SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS" that "the objectives and strategies (of food borne disease surveillance systems) established by each country should be acceptable to all member countries (www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/006/j2381e.htm)," which doubtless would take time.

Perhaps it is because "studies linking pathogens in food to the disease in humans would help quantify the risk of food borne diseases." In other words, no entity, not the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and not the WHO, can prove a significant problem exists in the United States.

The FSMA will not even quickly implement protections for Americans from contaminated foreign foodstuffs. The bill states, "(n)ot later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act" imported food products shall be certified safe "by the accredited foreign government (think CHINA!) or by an accredited certifying agent..." Again, what's the rush?

Maddeningly, the FSMA expects Congress to again approve a far-reaching bill without knowing the details. In this case, Congress will find out much later:

* what federal resources would be dedicated to foodborne illness and food safety research;

* what transfer of agencies, personnel, assets, obligations, and consolidation, reorganization, or streamlining of agencies will be involved; and

* the details of regulations the new Food Czar (Administrator of the FSA) will promulgate after enactment of the Act.



Among the statutory foundations the FSMA claims for guidance and authority is the National Animal Identification System, which HAS NEVER BEEN ENACTED INTO LAW BY CONGRESS!

But beyond the mandated violations of our civil liberties in the FSMA - registration, traceability, inspections, seizures, etc. (all without court orders or search warrants), - the truly chilling language lays out civil and criminal penalties of up to $1 million per day, per infraction, and imprisonment of five or ten years, or both, depending how serious the violation(s).

Additionally, "(a)n order assessing a civil penalty against a person... shall be a final order unless the person-- (A) not later than 30 days after the effective date of the order, files a petition for judicial review of the order in the United States court of appeals... (and) (t)he findings of the Administrator relating to the order shall be set aside only if found to be unsupported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole." The FSMA is so over-the-top in its overreach that the bill's language states, "(t)he validity and appropriateness of the order of the Administrator assessing the civil penalty shall not be subject to judicial review."

And if you're by now thinking this is about as outrageous as this bill can be, you'd be very wrong. Section 406 clearly states, "(i)n any action to enforce the requirements of the food safety law, the connection with interstate commerce required for jurisdiction SHALL BE PRESUMED TO EXIST."

Now, for those who noticed, and questioned, why "foodborne" is spelled as if we reside "on the Continent," and why the United States government is attempting to implement a "solution" wanting for a "problem" - you guessed it - "Foodborne Disease Monitoring and Surveillance Systems" are a priority with the World Health Organization, to which our national government has committed US through its membership.

The 53rd World Health Assembly (a branch of the WHO) in the year 2000 adopted a resolution to recognize food safety as an essential public health function and called for the development of a Global Strategy for reduction of the burden of food borne diseases. The resolution (WHA 53.15) encouraged member states "to implement and keep national, and when appropriate, regional mechanisms for food borne diseases surveillance." All this, despite the WHO admission in a 2004 report (www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/006/j2381e.htm) that "(t)he true dimension of the burden of food borne diseases is still unknown..."

The FSMA is a "government solution" in seek of a problem! In the year 1900 at least some cases in two of the ten leading causes of death might have been food related (diarrhea/enteritis, liver disease). But the twin leading causes were pneumonia, followed closely by tuberculosis.

In 2002, WHO listed the leading cause of death in the U.S. (www.who.int/whosis/mort/profiles/mort_amro_usa_
unitedstatesofamerica.pdf) as ischaemic heart disease, killing ~ 514,000 people. The second greatest cause was cerebrovascular disease (stroke), killing ~ 163,000. None of the top ten causes bore any relation to foodborne illness.

In apparent support of all this brazen, strong-arm command and control attempt, the CDC reports its estimate that every year in the United States sees approximately 76 million cases of foodborne illness (www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/meat/safe/foodborne.html), with 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths (which equates to one death out of every 15,200 who become ill). Admittedly those 5,000 deaths are significant, and devastating to all those involved, but this figure must be put in perspective. We must consider the larger picture long before we even consider such draconian measures as those mandated by the FSMA.

Perhaps too little is known of reports that "iatrogenic events" - medical errors - kill almost 800,000 in the U.S. each year (www.whale.to/a/null9.html#Underreporting_of_Iatrogenic_Events_). That's the equivalent of six jumbo jets falling out the sky each and every day. Those who track these events believe as few as 5% and no more than 20% of these deaths are ever reported.

Clearly deaths resulting from foodborne disease are exponentially lower than these other major causes, which begs an obvious question: If Congress is so very concerned about our health, why haven't they felt inclined to tackle the much more significant incidence of iatrogenic deaths in this nation? Hmmm?

One need only consider the "Healthy People 2010" goals (www.healthypeople.gov/About/goals.htm) to understand the true (A)genda behind this initiative.

ACTION TO TAKE

The FSMA is an extremely dangerous bill. We recommend a multi-prong attack, as the more salvos we throw at the FSMA the better chance we have of killing this abomination.

* Contact House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, via phone: (202) 225-0100, or email: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/.



* Contact the House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, via phone: 202.225.3130, or email: www.majorityleader.gov/email_and_rss/email_the_leader/.



* Contact the House Republican Leader John Boehner, via phone: (202) 225-4000, fax: (202) 225-5117, or email: http://republicanleader.house.gov/Contact/.



On March 11th Congress will hold its first hearing in many years on the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), conducted by the Livestock, Dairy and Poultry Subcommittee. It is vitally important you contact all the committees below.

* Contact the Livestock, Dairy and Poultry Subcommittee members listed below. If one of the Subcommittee members is from your state, call that member.

Mike Rogers (R-AL)
Phone: 202-225-3261
Fax: 202-226-8485

Dennis Cardoza (D-CA)
Phone: 202-225-6131
Fax: 202-225-0819

Jim Costa (D-CA)
Phone: 202-225-3341
Fax: 202-225-9308

Joe Baca (D-CA)
Phone: 202-225-6161
Fax: 202-225-8671

Betsy Markey (D-CO)
Phone: 202-225-4676
Fax: 202-225-5870

David Scott (Chair), (D-GA)
Phone: 202-225-2939
Fax: 202-225-4628

Leonard Boswell (D-IA)
Phone: 202-225-3806
Fax: 202-225-5608

Steve King (R-IA)
Phone: 202-225-4426
Fax: 202-225-3193

Walt Minnick (D-ID)
Phone: 202-225-6611
Fax: 202-225-3029

Frank Kratovil, Jr. (D-MD)
Phone: 202-225-5311
Fax: 202-225-0254

Adrian Smith (R-NE)
Phone: 202-225-6435
Fax: 202-225-0207

Tim Holden (D-PA)
Phone: 202-225-5546
Fax: 202-226-0996

David P. Roe (R-TN)
Phone: 202-225-6356
Fax: 202-225-5714

K. Michael Conaway (R-TX)
Phone: 202-225-3605 or 866-882-381
Fax: 202-225-1783

Randy Neugebauer, Ranking Minority Member (R-TX)
Phone: 202-225-4005 or 888-763-1611
Fax: 202-225-9615

Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)
Phone: 202-225-5431
Fax: 202-225-9681

Steve Kagen (D-WI)
Phone: 202-225-5665
Fax: 202-225-5729

* Contact your own Representative and ask him or her to approach the Subcommittee member to urge them to oppose NAIS.


If you're not sure who represents you, click here: www.congress.org/.

We strongly recommend that you make at least your initial contact by telephone.

Additionally, H.R. 875 has been assigned to the committees on Energy and Commerce, and Agriculture.

* Contact members of the Energy and Commerce Committee via phone: (202) 225-2927, or email: http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_
content&task=view&id=1313&Itemid=1.

* Contact members of the Agriculture Committee via phone: 202-225-2171, fax: 202-225-8510, or email: agriculture@mail.house.gov. Committee members are listed here: http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/members.html.


Make as many contacts as possible. Be polite, but firm.

* Tell them Americans will not stand for this unwarranted and unconstitutional abrogation of our liberty!

* Tell them THIS BILL NEEDS TO DIE IN COMMITTEE!!!

Visit the American Policy Center website